ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To observe the effect of S100A4 gene silencing mediated by small interfering RNA (siRNA) on the proliferation of bladder cancer stem cells (CSCs) and their capacity of xenograft tumor formation.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>MB49 bladder cancer stem cells (MCSCs) were isolated and identified. The differentially expressed protein S100A4 was identified in MCSCs using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation technology (iTRAQ). A siRNA targeting S100A4 was constructed and transfected into MCSCs, and its inhibitory effects on S100A4 expression in MCSCs were assessed with Western blotting and qPCR. The effects of siRNA-mediated S100A4 silencing on the proliferation and xenograft tumor formation ability of MCSCs were observed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Among the 65 differentially expressed proteins identified by iTRAQ combined with LC/MS/MS, S100A4 protein showed the most distinct differential expression in MCSCs. Transfection of MCSCs with S100A siRNA significantly inhibited the expressions of S100A4 at both mRNA and protein levels, caused obvious suppression of the cell proliferation, and attenuated the xenograft tumor formation ability of the cells in nude mice.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>S100A4 in MCSCs is associated with the recurrence and metastasis of bladder cancer. S100A4 may serve as a potential therapeutic target for eliminating bladder CSCs.</p>
ABSTRACT
Patients with extremely severe oligozoospermia (ESO) and cryptozoospermia (CO) are suitable using intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) as an infertility treatment. However, some andrologists are confused to distinguish ESO and CO in clinic diagnose. This study was designed for the first time to evaluate and compare patients with ESO and CO to determine whether these are useful clinical distinctions. A total of 270 infertile men in our center were classified into four groups as Group nonobstruction azoospermia (NOA, n = 44), Group ESO (n = 78), Group CO (n = 40), and Group obstruction azoospermia (OA, n = 108). Comparisons of the volume of bilateral testes, the level of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and inhibin B were obtained in four groups. Then comparisons of fertilization rates, cleavage rate, and excellent embryos rate were obtained when couples performed ICSI. All indexes (volume of bilateral testis, level of FSH and inhibin B) in Groups ESO and CO were no difference, while Groups OA versus NOA, OA versus ESO, and OA versus CO were significant differences (P < 0.05). The rates of fertilization were no differences in Groups ESO and CO while Groups OA versus ESO, OA versus CO were significant differences (P < 0.05). Therefore, the spermatogenic functions in patients with CO and ESO were similar, better than NOA but worse than OA. However, it would be helpful to evaluate their spermatogenesis using testicular biopsies, especially accompanied azoospermia in clinical practice.